1. Program Characteristics
Table 1a - School AffiliationThe locus of graduate education in the neural sciences continues to evolve. In the 1991 survey, graduate programs located in Schools of Medicine were most numerous, and relatively few programs were University-wide and integrated across both Schools of Medicine and Schools of Arts & Sciences (or the equivalent). In the 2000 survey, in contrast, an increased percentage of programs were found in Schools of Arts & Sciences or were university-wide and included both Schools of Medicine and Schools of Arts & Sciences. (Data not obtained in 1986 survey.)
| Survey Year | 91 | 98 | 00* |
| Percent of Total | |||
| School of Medicine | 38 | 43 | 32 |
| Arts & Sciences | 30 | 30 | 41 |
| Both SOM and A&S | 17 | 21 | 23 |
| Other | 15 | 7 | 5 |
* Survey question #4
Table 1b - Administrative Structure and Degree Granted
The administrative structure of graduate programs in the neural sciences is quite varied. Only 15% of current programs are found exclusively in Departments of Neuroscience or Neurobiology (or in departments that had those words in their name, such as "Behavioral Neuroscience" and "Anatomy and Neurobiology"). In contrast, 69% of the programs link neuroscientists in multiple departments (or in a "Division" or "Institute" of Neuroscience) in a unified, degree-granting program, and only 15% are in departments that did not have Neuroscience or Neurobiology in their names. [Survey question #5, not asked in previous ANDP surveys.]
One implication of this administrative structure is that, unlike departments, only 54% of graduate training programs in the neural sciences hire their own faculty. [Survey question #10, not asked in previous ANDP surveys.]. Another implication is that the degree awarded to graduate students trained in the neural sciences is much more likely to be a Ph.D. in Neuroscience or Neurobiology (or in disciplines that had those words in their name) than a Ph.D. in another discipline. This feature, first seen in the 1998 survey, represents a striking reversal from the situation 15 years ago, when the majority of degrees were awarded in other disciplines. (The "Other" category represents the relatively few graduate training programs in Neuroscience that do not offer a Ph.D. degree.) Note that throughout this report, "Neuroscience" and "Neurobiology" are used interchangeably.
| Survey Year | 86 | 91 | 98 | 00* |
|
Percent of Total |
||||
| Ph.D. in Neuroscience | 24 | 28 | 66 | 67 |
| Ph.D. in another discipline | 74 | 54 | 30 | 29 |
| Other | 2 | 18 | 4 | 4 |
* Survey question #6
Table 1c - Undergraduate Activities
Graduate programs in the neural sciences now play a very substantial role in the education of undergraduate students. Although only 22% of the graduate programs additionally administer an undergraduate program in Neuroscience, faculty in most graduate programs teach undergraduate courses (72%) and provide opportunities for undergraduate students to be involved in research projects (94%). These important contributions are much greater than those observed 10 years ago.
| Survey Year | 86 | 91 | 98 | 00* |
|
Percent of Total |
||||
| Formal Program | - | 23 | 24 | 22 |
| Teaching | 9 | 48 | 39 | 72 |
| Research | - | 68 | 62 | 94 |
* Survey questions #7-9
| Prog. Characteristics | Faculty | Grad. Education | Postdoc. Training | Diversity | Financial Support | Undergrad. Education | Summary | Conclusions | Report Home | ANDP Home |
February 22, 2007
Copyright © 2001 Association of Neuroscience Departments and Programs, Bethesda, MD